For centuries, the dominant theory in geology has been uniformitarianism, which holds that geological events occur slowly and steadily over a long period of time. However, in recent years, there has been a resurgence of interest in an alternative theory known as catastrophism, which suggests that geological events are largely the result of sudden, catastrophic events such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and meteor impacts. In this article, we will explore the evidence supporting the idea of catastrophism and why it should be considered as a dominant explanation for geological events.

First, it’s important to address the limitations of uniformitarianism. The assumption of constant rates and conditions over a long period of time is not supported by evidence from the geological record. In particular, there are numerous examples of sudden changes in the geological record that cannot be explained by slow, gradual processes.

One of the most notable examples is the work of geologist Robert Schoch, who has studied ancient civilizations and geological events and has found evidence to support the idea that geological events have been shaped primarily by catastrophic events. For instance, Schoch’s research has shown that the Sphinx in Egypt is much older than previously thought and that it was likely carved in response to a catastrophic event such as a severe drought.

Another key figure in the rebirth of catastrophism is Graham Hancock, an author and researcher who has explored the relationship between ancient civilizations and geological events. Hancock argues that ancient civilizations had a greater understanding of the role of catastrophes in shaping the world and that they used this knowledge to build monuments and structures that were designed to withstand such events.

Furthermore, recent events such as volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and meteor impacts demonstrate that catastrophic events continue to shape our world today. These events provide valuable insights into the processes that have shaped our planet over time and support the idea that geological events are largely the result of sudden, catastrophic events.

To further support the idea of catastrophism, data from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) shows that the frequency of earthquakes of magnitude 7.0 or greater has increased dramatically in recent years, from an average of 21 events per year in the 1990s to over 30 events per year in the 2010s. This increase in seismic activity supports the idea that catastrophic events continue to play a dominant role in shaping our planet.

Additionally, recent research has suggested that cyclical solar flares could be a possible trigger for these catastrophic events. Solar flares are explosive releases of energy from the Sun that can have a significant impact on our planet. It has been suggested that increased solar activity could lead to more frequent and intense flares, which could in turn trigger geological events such as earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.

Moreover, the study of mass extinctions in the geological record provides compelling evidence for catastrophism. The sudden loss of a large portion of the earth’s species cannot be explained by slow, gradual processes but rather by a catastrophic event like an asteroid impact. The discovery of impact craters and other evidence of large-scale impacts supports this idea.

Additionally, the study of ancient climate change and its effects on the earth provides further support for catastrophism. Sudden shifts in climate caused by volcanic eruptions, meteor impacts, and other events have had a significant impact on the planet and its biosphere. These events, which led to mass extinctions and significant changes in the earth’s climate, could not have been caused by slow, gradual processes.

In conclusion, the rebirth of catastrophism offers a compelling explanation.

Thanks For Reading, Check out more at WhatWhyHow.net

Brandon Cobb,  Aka. Darksun22